UNFOLDING: He Accused Major Democrat Of Pedophilia…Look Where He Was just Found DEAD!

A man who made startling accusations towards a former Seattle Mayor and was just found dead in random hotel room. Former Mayor Ed Murray was forced to resign after the man accused him of repeatedly paying for sex while the man was still a teenage boy. His name is Delvonn Heckard and his accusations prompted others to accuse former Mayor Murray of similar allegations involving child sexual abuse. One of the other men who accused Murray of sexual abuse was his cousin, Joseph Dyer, who was the fifth overall person to accuse Murray of sexually related crimes against children and teenagers.

Heckard had filed a lawsuit against Murray, reportedly accusing Murray of paying him for sex when he was a teenager in the 1980’s. Then other people accused Murray of similar crimes that apparently took place while they lived in Portland, Oregon. Heckard more recently filed a lawsuit against the former Democrat Mayor, who eventually resigned from his political position. The accusations of child sex crimes had ended Murray’s political career as the Mayor of Seattle, but he declines the incidents ever happened.

Heckard recently received a $100,000 settlement check of a $150,000 settlement, in December of 2017, from the city of Seattle. He was the only accuser to take him to court for the allegations of child sex abuse. The settlement came as a result of Heckard dropping charges against Murray.

Heckard was recently found dead in a hotel room of what authorities have listed as a drug overdose. He was suffering from years of abusing various drugs and once claimed that his attempt to be sober, and the passing of his father, are what brought him to confront the former alleged sexual predator. It’s thought that his years of drug abuse stem from the events that may have taken place where he was allegedly given money for sex.

Seattle Times reported more on the hotel death:
“In my opinion, a hero died today,” attorney Lincoln Beauregard said Friday morning.

The King County Medical Examiner’s Office confirmed Heckard’s death on Friday afternoon, noting the official cause and manner of his death are pending.

About 2:05 a.m., police and fire medics responded to a room at the Auburn Motel on Auburn Way South for the apparent drug overdose of a middle-aged black male, Auburn Assistant Chief Bill Pierson said early Friday.

Pierson, who declined to identify Heckard, said medics unsuccessfully attempted to resuscitate the man. Police interviewed a witness, he said, and found “some type of medication in the room, as well as some illicit drug paraphernalia.”

Heckard had been in recovery for addiction to cocaine and other illicit drugs when he sued Murray in April, alleging Murray had repeatedly paid him for sex in the late 1980s when he was a teenager.

Heckard turned 47 on Valentine’s Day. He recently received a $100,000 payment as part of a $150,000 settlement with the city of Seattle to dismiss his suit against Murray and the city. Beauregard said he had set up a trust account for Heckard so he wouldn’t spend the money too quickly.”

This story will travel in many directions. Some will suggest that Heckard is a known drug addict with a criminal history and overlook the hotel death as just another drug overdose. Others might suggest that Heckard was murdered by being fed drugs because that would be believable due to his history of drug use. Investigations will determine the official cause of death and determine if there was any foul play. The story is expected to be bent 100 different ways, so it’s critically to wait until the official details are released and then analyze the information afterward.

There is potential for a revenge plot from Murray, to take out Heckard with his favorite poisons. However, that would effectively end the life of Murray if he’s ever accused or caught in a murder plot. Would he do that after the charges against him were already dropped and settled? One would hope not.

The other side could be that Heckard began spending his settlement money on hard drugs and did this to himself by accident. That’s something that a toxicology report might be able to determine. One might wonder if he spent his settlement money on drugs, or if he was still attempting to be sober, then why would he be into drugs again?

rooked Hillary And Her Campaign Take Shellacking On Live TV After Reporter Exposes Major Cover-Up

After more than a year of the Trump Administration, it seems the mainstream media is still in a quandary about what cost Hillary the 2016 election. It’s 2018, but instead of focusing on the big issues of the day and problems that could actually make our lives better if we solved them, we’re still asking “what happened with Hillary.”

Usually, the softball approach by the media makes it easy for anyone on the DNC’s back pocket to sail through these types of questions, towing the party line and planting doubt about President Trump. This time though, CBS’s Nancy Cordes might have accidentally stumbled into a little real journalism with her question for former Clinton campaign manager, John Podesta.

Cordes was, of course, focusing on the Russia angle in the light of the recent Muller indictments.  Her question for Podesta was, basically, if you’re so sure it was the Russians, how did they know how to do your job better than you know how to do your job? Why did they have their finger on the pulse of what the nation needed, and you didn’t? The Daily Caller reports on Podesta’s sit down with CBS, and you can see for yourself just what he had to say about the new and improved Russia story:

“Former Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta had a brutal exchange on CBS’s ‘Face the Nation’ on Sunday when asked about the campaign’s failure to focus on so-called “purple states” in 2016.

Host Nancy Cordes noted that an indictment handed down by special counsel Robert Mueller on Friday showed that Russian operatives who meddled in the election appeared to realize the importance of focusing on those battleground contests.

‘How is it that these Russian operatives knew to focus on purple states like Michigan and Wisconsin and your campaign didn’t?’ Nancy Cordes, the host of ‘Face the Nation,’ asked Podesta.

‘Of course, we spent a lot of time and energy and effort in all those states,’ Podesta insisted.

‘Hillary Clinton did not spend much time,’ Cordes interjected.

‘We had [Vice Presidential nominee] Tim Kaine was there, Barack Obama, and she spent enormous time in Pennsylvania and Michigan,’ said Podesta.

‘We spent a lot of effort, we had staff in Wisconsin that even President Obama had in 2012.’

Clinton and her campaign have been heavily criticized for failing to campaign heavily in swing states like Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, all of which the former secretary of state lost in a surprise upset to Trump.

Clinton did not visit Wisconsin at all during the campaign. By contrast, Trump visited the state five times during the last three months of the campaign.

Clinton has attributed her loss to Russian active measures, which included purchasing social media ads and leaking hacked emails. She has also blamed former FBI Director James Comey for re-opening the investigation into her email server just days before the election.”

It seems that everyone is to blame for Hillary’s loss, except for Hillary. Sadly for her, she’s no longer going to be able to blame President Trump for the Russia collusion. The information found by the Muller investigative team prove, despite their best efforts, that any contact the Russians had with the Trump campaign was completely unknown by the Trump campaign:

“A federal grand jury issued indictments Friday for 13 Russian nationals and three Russian companies suspected of interfering in the 2016 election, the special counsel’s office announced.

According to the indictment, signed by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, the Russian nationals began conspiring as early as 2014 to interfere ‘with the U.S. political and electoral processes, including the presidential election of 2016.’

Part of the scheme involved defendants posing as Americans and communicating “with unwitting individuals associated with the Trump campaign and with other political activists to seek to coordinate political activities.”

In a press briefing held shortly after the indictment was announced, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said that there was no allegation in the indictment that “any American” — including members of the Trump campaign — “was a knowing participant in the alleged unlawful activity.”

Rosenstein also said that “there is no allegation in the indictment that the charged conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election.”

The operation advanced in several stages over the two-plus years leading up to the election. The indictment suggests that many of the efforts were aimed at hurting Hillary Clinton’s election chances by boosting her opponents, including Donald Trump, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and Green Party candidate Jill Stein.

In April 2016, the Russians began paying for political advertisements on social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter. By June 2016, they began organizing political rallies, largely aimed at supporting Trump and criticizing Clinton.

There is little evidence that the social media scheme altered the outcome of the election, as Democrats have claimed. Trump has asserted that Russian interference had no effect[sic] on the election results.”

Even Hillary’s husband, former President Bill Clinton, told her campaign to reach out to voters other than the Dem base, but they wouldn’t listen to him.

In April of 2017 ABC News reported:

“Former President Bill Clinton’s warnings to speak to swing voters fell on deaf ears during Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, according to the authors of “Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign,” a new book about purported dysfunction in the campaign team.

In the book, the authors describe how the campaign ignored the advice of Clinton’s husband, former President Bill Clinton, to reach out to communities that weren’t already on board with Hillary Clinton’s policies.

“He thought, these eggheads don’t really know politics. They don’t understand persuasion,” Allen said, adding that Bill Clinton wanted to go to suburban and rural areas where it was likely that Hillary Clinton wouldn’t win the majority. “He knew there was some power just in showing up.“”

Imagine that, it looks like America voted for President Trump because they wanted him. It’s more than a little ironic that the very investigation that the Democrats pushed so hard for has done nothing but uncover corruption in their party, and point out Hillary’s failings. No great tragedy without some small gain, thankfully it’s Americans that are gaining now, finally.

BREAKING News In Seth Rich’s Murder – New Files He Had Just Found And Who Didn’t Want Them Out

It has been almost two years since Democratic staffer Seth Rich was shot to death in cold blood, and still, there are more questions than answers. Ever since Seth Rich’s body was found on a Washington D.C. park bench, the mainstream media and the Washington D.C. police have pushed the theory that the cause of Rich’s death was due to a robbery that went wrong. However, for many Americans across the country, that theory never settled right considering the strange events leading up to Rich’s death, which point to something much more nefarious.

Though over the past year, Rich’s death has been overshadowed by the absurd Russian collusion investigation instead of solving this young man’s death. However, new evidence has been discovered that may breath new life into the case leading us to who did this, and of course, Democrats are panicking.

The Seth Rich murder case has intrigued people since it occurred since it uncovers the horrible corruption inside the Democrat party and how far they would go to protect all of their shameful secrets.

As you know, Rich was a disgruntled DNC staffer who also happened to be a HUGE Bernie Sanders supporter. So, after Hillary Clinton stole the nomination from Sanders, friends close to Rich reported that he was incredibly upset, and wanting justice to be served. Shortly after Rich voiced his anger towards the Clinton camp, 44,000 DNC emails were released to WikiLeaks that showed the absolute evil of the Democrat party. In fact, these emails were so damaging that many people have said they are what caused Hillary Clinton to lose the election in 2016, which as we know has fueled the Democrats rage for the last year.

The left in their anger over their massive loss to President Trump has been looking to blame someone else for these leaked emails instead of Seth Rich, and the reason why is simple. If the left admits that it was Seth Rich who leaked these emails, then they would have to accept that his death was mysterious and investigate Hillary Clinton which is who they are trying to protect.

Though the truth always comes out no matter how hard you try to keep it hidden as the left is about to find out after what one leading hacker just released.

Here is more from WND:

A prominent computer hacker who believes it was a Democratic National Committee insider who stole the DNC emails that were made public by WikiLeaks during the 2016 presidential campaign is doubling down on his claim.

The hacker, Kim Dotcom, said in a tweet Monday that “the DNC hack wasn’t even a hack,” reported Tyler Durden at the Zerohedge blog.

“It was an insider with a memory stick. I know this because I know who did it and why. Special Counsel Mueller is not interested in my evidence. My lawyers wrote to him twice. He never replied. 360 pounds,” Dotcom wrote.


The leaks revealed a panoply of questionable activities on the part of the DNC, which clearly was all in for Clinton even during the primary.

Explained Zerohedge: “Dotcom’s assertion is backed up by an analysis done last year by a researcher who goes by the name Forensicator, who determined that the DNC files were copied at 22.6 MB/s – a speed virtually impossible to achieve from halfway around the world, much less over a local network – yet a speech typical of file transfers to a memory stick.”

The report explained why that issue is so significant today, especially to Democrats still faithful to the theory that it was Russians in collusion with the Trump campaign that stole the computer data.

“The local transfer theory of course [blew] the Russian hacking narrative out of the water, lending credibility to the theory that the DNC ‘hack’ was, in fact, an inside job, potentially implication IT staffer, Seth Rich,” Zerohedge said.

Significantly, the DNC declined to allow anyone, law enforcement included, to examine the server that allegedly was hacked.

Dotcom has volunteered to testify to Congress regarding the Russia investigation and the DNC email leak.

He tweeted a summary of his testimony last year: “I knew Seth Rich. I know he was the @WikiLeaks source. I was involved.”

He even talked with lawyers at the time, stating: “I accept that my full statement should be provided to the authorities and I am prepared to do that so that there can be a full investigation. My lawyers will speak with the authorities regarding the proper process. If my evidence is required to be given in the United States I would be prepared to do so if appropriate arrangements are made. I would need a guarantee from Special Counsel Mueller, on behalf of the United States, of safe passage from New Zealand to the United States and back.”

If Mueller were genuinely concerned with seeking the truth, he would sit down and speak to this hacker, but he isn’t since it would only point to the crimes of the real criminals in the Democrat party.

However, it is only a matter of time before the truth comes pouring out over Seth Rich’s murder, which his family and the American people deserve to hear. For too long we have been lied to and controlled by the Deep State and now is the time to flush them out.

WHOA! Angry Teachers Just Risked Everything To NOT Be Next Target – Is This A Good Idea?

America just witnessed a deadly school shooting at a Florida high school, and social media erupted in a massive discussion about how to prevent the next shooting. Hardcore Democrats begged for gun control and confiscation. Those on the right argued for more logical solutions such as mental health screening and ensuring that bad guys don’t get guns while the good guys aren’t affected. All the conversations in the world won’t do anything to solve the problem, but there’s one solution that can help right away. People need to know how to protect themselves and others. If there’s a school shooting and police are called right away, then they still take a few minutes to arrive. By then the school shooter has already murdered multiple people. What is the one way that a school shooter can be neutralized in a faster time than it takes the police to arrive? That question is easy! Every school should have police armed and ready to deal with every school situation and crime.

Most American schools already have active shooter and lockdown procedures in place. These practices have been in place for decades. Locked doors, away from the windows, and classmates ready to fight if anyone breaches the locked doors that the students are protected behind. Many American schools lock the doors of the building and already have metal detectors. Many schools have armed police or security guards. All of these practices are logical and common sense. The schools who practice these methods of protection, especially those with an armed guard, are not usually targets of school shooters. If these practices aren’t logical enough, then there’s one group taking things a step farther to ensure their safety. Their methodology might be controversial to some people, but to other’s it’s a brilliant idea. It may not be for everyone though, as only a particular group of highly trusted people should be considered for this job. Some schools are taking things one step further and considering arming teachers with weapons to defend themselves.

A school in New Mexico is allowing some of the teachers to carry a gun that can be used to protect their school from a school shooting incident. A 5-10 second response from a trained gun owner can quickly diminish the threat of a school shooting faster than it takes the police to arrive in several minutes. If a well-trained gun owner in a school shoots the school shooter, then lives are saved, and students can continue their studies the very next day. That’s why a school in New Mexico is allowing their staff to carry weapons. They’re also considering using trained police dogs to work for the school and provide another level of security.
Inside Edition posted more on the school:
“At a parochial school in New Mexico, many of the teachers carry guns as a precaution.

One pastor carries a .45 in a case that looks like a Bible. The principal is also armed with a .38 semi-automatic pistol.

In one of their classrooms, students say they feel safer knowing there are adults with the weapons.

Safety and security expert Bill Stanton suggests that trained dogs be assigned to schools to assist in taking down a shooter.

Stanton says that fear will often keep a shooter from firing on the canine.

“The first thing you think of is fear,” Stanton said. “That is all you need to buy that time to get those kids in a safe space or to evacuate completely.”

An organization called K9s4Kids helps place K-9 dogs with officers who patrol schools.”

A combination of armed staff and K-9 dogs will provide an excellent level of extra protection for students. In most cases, it would prevent the school shooter from choosing that school as a victim. School shooters wouldn’t want to get shot at right away, nor would they want to be attacked by dogs, so there’s a minimal chance that anyone would attack a school that has their form of protection. Most school shootings happen at schools where there’s very little protection or armed guards.

It should be stated that not every teacher is capable of carrying or handling a loaded weapon. If schools ever allow this, then there should be extensive training, mental health check, and the teacher should prove they can manage their students before they think about handling a weapon. It would be best if only police were armed and each school had their own set of well-trained police officers assigned to protect the school and help with safety. That would allow teachers to do their job while the officers keep the school safe from external threats.

One Sheriff is taking matters into his own hands and providing free gun training for teachers. But don’t forget, some teachers are hardcore liberals who had a meltdown when Donald Trump became President. If they can’t handle that, then I don’t think they should be allowed to carry a weapon in a school. If this is done on a large scale, then we need to be very careful which teachers are allowed to carry weapons. Some just could not handle it, but many would become a hero if they had to be. Most teachers are heroes to our kids every day, but some people just aren’t cut out for it. Here is the sheriff offering free gun training in his area. He’s a good man!


What do you want your neighborhood schools to do for protection? Please comment your opinion and share this to keep the conversation going!

Americans SICK At What Fergie Did During Her National Anthem Performance At NBA All Stars Game

he 2018 NBA All-Star game started off with a bang. Something happened before the players took the court and everyone must watch this at least once with their volume turned on loud enough to wake the neighbors. This was Fergie singing the National Anthem, and it has become the worst rendition of our beloved anthem that you will ever witness. Carl Lewis once held the world title for singing the worst National Anthem when he gave his legendary performance at the 1993 NBA Finals. Then Fergie said “hold my cup” and took the stage in Los Angeles and belted out her best version of the Star Spangled Banner which resembled something you’d hear from an intoxicated person on karaoke night.

Fergies National Anthem was so bad that Colin Kaepernick would have gotten off his knee to tell her to do better. Even though she was standing for the National Anthem, this is the one time we wished she sat down. I’ll let you watch the video, and then we’ll give more details on this hilarious monstrosity that has blown over social media like a massive tornado.

Fergie’s National Anthem sounded like a messed up jazz rendition of the great American song. She completely butchered it. Did you see the faces that people made in the video? They could barely contain themselves. You could tell some players wanted to make a face or laugh really hard out loud, but most of them kept their composure because they’re professionals.

BizPacReview reported more on Fergie’s lousy singing:
“Fergie went for a little switch-up with the national anthem, but ended up dropping the ball.

The former Black Eyed Peas vocalist sang “The Star-Spangled Banner” at Sunday night’s NBA All-Star game in Los Angeles–and her curious rendition had players and fans bursting out in laughter.

The anthem performance, marked by a number of unique inflections, was immediately dubbed the worst in basketball history–even worse than Olympic track and fielder Carl Lewis’ legendary delivery at the 1993 NBA finals.

Viewers noted that even the all star athletes at the event were unable to hide their surprise, with Golden State Warrior Draymond Green visibly breaking down in laughter.

Other Twitter users mocked Fergie’s performance in a number of ways, from comparing it to Marilyn Monroe’s famous “Happy Birthday, Mr. President” number to describing it as akin to a “drunk mom acting sexy.”

One user suggested that Fergie’s ex-husband, Josh Duhamel, “made the right choice” in separating from the singer.”

The National Anthem was meant to be performed in a particular and patriotic manner. It’s acceptable when musicians change the style a bit, but only if they do it well. I’m not sure if Fergie performed this in front of her peers to get a review of it. If she did, and they told her it sounded great, then they failed her miserably, or they trolled her hard. It was more acceptable when Fergie urinated on herself during a concert than it was to destroy the National Anthem like this. It sounded like a farm animal being abused and that’s a terrible thing to hear.

If Fergie sang her heart out and performed a wonderful job, then we’d be having a different discussion. Instead, we’re all cracking up and wondering how she could think this would be a good idea. Teenagers are singing in their cars and can do a better job than this. Next time the NBA should have people perform a practice version before allowing them to take the main stage during an All-Star game.

Here are some very funny Twitter responses to Fergie’s National Anthem.



And there we have it, folks. We finally found something more offensive to the National Anthem than Colin Kaepernick taking a knee. In reality, they were both bad. But there’s something horrible about this singing that we can’t get out of our ears. Next time there’s karaoke at a local dive bar, then we’ll be sure to call Fergie.

Hopefully, she doesn’t attempt this ever again.

Brad Pitt Just Destroyed Career With Shock Announcement He Made About Shooting

Less than a week ago, our country was rocked when we learned that a teenager senselessly murdered students and teachers at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida. The tragedy comes after numerous shootings have occurred over the last several months and of course, the liberals across the country and those in Hollywood have wasted no time in pushing for more gun control citing that is the only way to stop potential shootings.

However, not all celebrities share that same belief system as Hollywood heavyweight Brad Pitt just announced, putting his career in jeopardy with the spiteful left.

For years, we have heard the left claim that they are the party of acceptance and tolerance, but that is hardly the truth. In fact, the left cannot stand anyone who does not share their same toxic ideology and will destroy them with no questions asked. That has been proven multiple times with plenty of Hollywood actors, but the most prominent example of their intolerance is President Donald Trump. It was not that long ago, Trump was welcomed in all circles of Hollywood royalty, but the moment he began to speak out against Barack Obama and run as a Republican candidate the left went into full attack mode.

Now, Hollywood actor Brad Pitt may face the same wrath as President Trump did after taking the stance against banning guns in the country.

In an interview not too long ago, Pitt spoke out against the removal of the Second Amendment from the constitution and punishing law-abiding gun owners in America. Pitt who was raised in Springfield, MO by a blue-collar family grew up his whole life around guns and as we can all see has not shot up any schools or churches, right?

Here is more from Brad Pitt and his stance on guns in America.

Describing America as “a country founded on guns,” Brad Pitt told the Daily Mail that “It’s in our DNA. It’s very strange but I feel better having a gun. I really do. I don’t feel safe, I don’t feel the house is completely safe if I don’t have one hidden somewhere. That’s my thinking, right or wrong.”

Pitt was raised in Springfield, Missouri by a father who ran a trucking company, and his mother, a school counselor. He explains that schools in the region were “sane environments” made “safer, not more dangerous, by the presence of guns.”
“I got my first BB gun (a type of air gun) when I was in nursery school. I got my first shotgun by first grade (aged six), I had shot a handgun by third grade (aged eight) and I grew up in a pretty sane environment.

“I was in the UK when the shootings happened and I did hear the discussion about gun control start again, and as far as I know it petered out as it always does.”
The actor and producer also predicted the anti-gun lobby will never win their fight against the Second Amendment.

The average American will never let them take away our right to defend ourselves. They are waging a war against the American psyche.

“It’s just something with us. To turn around and ask us to give up our guns… I don’t know, we’re too afraid that we’re going to give up ours and the bad guys are still going to get theirs. It’s just in our thinking. I’m telling you, we don’t know America without guns.“
There is no doubt that we have seen an increase of gun-related incidents, but it should not take a person with a genius intellect to figure out what the issue is. For decades, we have had guns in our country, and it has not been until recently that we have seen more shootings occur on a frequent basis, and the common denominator is not the weapon they choose.
The majority of these shooters are on medication or suffer from mental illness that in most cases are not being treated. The weapon that these deranged psychopaths choose is not the issue, but the left is incapable of seeing that. Instead of pushing for more gun control in America why aren’t we focusing on getting rid of gun free zones, teaching our youth to respect life, and having honest conversations about mental illness that is affecting millions of people in our country.
Disarming the millions of law-abiding gun owners in the United States will not change a thing since a criminal will find a way to carry out his nefarious deeds. While it may seem at times that many people in America do not understand that logic it is simply not true as Brad Pitt just demonstrated which gives me hope for the rest of the nation.

Crucial Evidence In Florida Shooting Being DESTROYED – FBI Desperate To Cover Big Detail

President Donald Trump is blasting the FBI for its failures to follow up on the tip about Nikolas Cruz.  Cruz went on to take the lives of some 17 students and teachers on Valentine’s Day. He suggested the FBI was “spending too much time” on the fictional witchhunt for Russian collusion into the 2016 presidential election and not effectively doing their jobs to the best of their ability.

President Trump took to social media on the evening of February 17, 2018, with a no holds barred blasting of the FBI and what he considers their extreme failure in the wake of the Parkland, Florida school massacre, tweeting –

Very sad that the FBI missed all of the many signals sent out by the Florida school shooter. This is not acceptable. They are spending too much time trying to prove Russian collusion with the Trump campaign – there is no collusion. Get back to the basics and make us all proud!


The FBI themselves along with FBI director Christopher Wray made statements acknowledging the failure of the agency to address and to act on tips provided to them regarding Cruz prior to his bloody rampage through Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.  The Bureau acknowledged many failures on their part and promised a swift and factual investigation into where and why the failure occurred.

The FBI has revealed it received at least two separate tips about Cruz.  The first tip came approximately five months ago. However, the FBI said agents were unable to link the tip to Cruz at the time. In the second tip, made six weeks ago, the bureau admitted protocol was not followed and the information was never investigated.

The FBI’s official statement to the public in the wake of the events in Parkland that devastated so many families reads –

On January 5, 2018, a person close to Nikolas Cruz contacted the FBI’s Public Access Line (PAL) tipline to report concerns about him. The caller provided information about Cruz’s gun ownership, desire to kill people, erratic behavior, and disturbing social media posts, as well as the potential of him conducting a school shooting.

Under established protocols, the information provided by the caller should have been assessed as a potential threat to life. The information then should have been forwarded to the FBI Miami Field Office, where appropriate investigative steps would have been taken.

We have determined that these protocols were not followed for the information received by the PAL on January 5. The information was not provided to the Miami Field Office, and no further investigation was conducted at that time.

In a separate statement, FBI Director Christopher Wray stated –

“We are still investigating the facts. I am committed to getting to the bottom of what happened in this particular matter, as well as reviewing our processes for responding to information that we receive from the public. It’s up to all Americans to be vigilant, and when members of the public contact us with concerns, we must act properly and quickly.

“We have spoken with victims and families, and deeply regret the additional pain this causes all those affected by this horrific tragedy. All of the men and women of the FBI are dedicated to keeping the American people safe, and are relentlessly committed to improving all that we do and how we do it.”

Now the scene where 17 students and teachers’ lives were snuffed out too soon is being scheduled for demolition. Local authorities in Parkland, Florida are to demolish Building 12 at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School following the Valentine’s Day massacre that took so much from so many.

Florida lawmakers want to raze the building to eradicate the memory of shooter.  Instead, they wish to erect a memorial that will honor victims and their families.

Sen. Bill Galvano, R-Bradenton spoke on Friday after visiting the school just one day prior the horror of the scene and how the devastation was just palpable. He stated –  “This building has to come down. Everything was strewn across the halls from people running and dodging and there were significant blood splatters on the wall, like someone took a milk jug and exploded it.”

Sen. Lauren Book, D-Plantation, echoed that sentiment, stating – “These kids are not going to go back into that building ever again.“As did Sen. Wilton Simpson, R-Trilby, when he stated – “We need to take a serious look at tearing down that building and build a facility that these kids could return to and be proud of. Early estimates indicate the cost of a replacement building is between $25 million and $30 million. It will still be very difficult for students to return. But that particular building should be razed, and the memory of the perpetrator erased and a memorial honoring the victims and their families be put in its place.”

Broward County Schools Superintendent Robert Runcie spoke on Friday afternoon in agreement in his belief that the building serving some 900 students would not be reopened, proposing – “Parents and students have told me very clearly they’re not going to go back into that building and I believe they’re right. In an ideal world, there would be sufficient funding to do a replacement building at a different site on the campus and then erect a memorial on that location.”

Early estimates indicate the cost of a replacement building is somewhere in the neighborhood of $25 million and $30 million. Runcie later confirmed that while the demolition is not a “done deal,” he does support the request that has been made by “students, parents, and members of the community.” The Sun-Sentinal reports – “The proposal would need School Board and state approval, as well as funding, Runcie said. He said he plans to talk with legislative leaders about possible funding for a replacement building. The building was constructed in 2009, and a state waiver would be needed to demolish a facility that new.”

In the meantime, the school district is working on a reviewing its current plan for students to return to school with a decision anticipated within the next 24-40 hours. It is tentatively being proposed that teachers will return first in order to allow them an additional day to prepare for the return of the student body.

All Anti-American Olympians Who Blamed Trump For Loss Just Got Bad News Before Returning To U.S.!

The 2018 Winter Olympics is finishing the first week of the games but it’s already over for Team USA – and not because of their lack of medals to bring home. The games began with a really disturbing start on multiple levels, from athletes publicly slamming our administration, to the Olympic Committee making sure awards are not based on merit, but diversity in skin color and sexual orientation. Now, only the Olympians on Team USA were just blindsided by more bad news. No sooner did the games begin, which these athletes have worked years to get to, they find out it’s over – for some even before they even had a chance to compete.

The Olympics is supposed to be about good sportsmanship, an impressive level of achievement. Athletes who have made it to this point did so through their own hard work and dedication to the sport – they weren’t selected to be there by affirmative action. The only thing that got one competitor or team of competitors in the door, was having worked harder than those they were up against. Sheer determination and skill level, not race, has put the best of the best athletes up against each other, just how it should be.

However, it seems that many on Team USA have been poisoned by the Barack Obama era and set the tone of racism, entitlement, and total divisiveness before they even got to South Korea to compete. It only got worse once they arrived and had attention from the world’s stage. That’s when US speedskater Shani Davis declared a totally fair coin toss racist since he wasn’t picked to carry the American flag. Gay Figure skater and medal winner Adam Rippon continued his spread of false claims and extreme hate for Vice President Mike Pence who was there to show his support for him. Downhill skier Lindsey Vonn’s also continues to discredit our president, declaring herself as “Captain America,” not Trump.

Coming fresh off the heels of the worst season of America’s former favorite sport, these Olympic athletes should have taken note of what mixing divisive opinions into sports does. The NFL may never recover from having done that and now Team USA is feeling the burn for themselves. Americans are fed-up with this abuse of a public platform and entitled athletes souring an enjoyable past time with their opinions. People are proving that watching the sports isn’t important to them and have found better things to do with their time.

Like the NFL, the Olympics has suffered a devastating drop in ratings from Americans not watching their team of Olympians compete. This is unfortunate for the innocent athletes who didn’t go to South Korea with any agenda other than winning. A few hateful competitors ruined it for everyone who isn’t getting the support from back home now since citizens aren’t tuning in to take part of what the racist, anti-Christian, and Trump-bashing athletes are doing and saying.

Ratings for the Winter Olympics opening ceremony and the first few days of broadcasts are in, and the results are not good news for NBC as ratings have fallen significantly from four years ago.

The numbers show that the opening ceremonies for the PyeongChang, South Korea, Winter Games saw a ratings dip over the 2014 games in Sochi, Russia. “Viewership for the PyeongChang Opening Ceremony was down over 10% compared to Sochi’s Opening Ceremony. The number of viewers dropped from 31.7 viewers to 28.3 viewers according to Deadline,” Awful Announcing reported.

“These numbers come off another dip from the Sochi games on the night before the Opening Ceremony. Those ratings from the first night of the PyeongChang Games were down a whopping 22% compared to four years ago.”

This means that ratings are going to have to improve over the next two weeks as the games continue if NBC is to reach its viewership goals. But that is not generally seen historically. In general, ratings fall from the opening ceremony to the closing days as the high profile competitions finish and the viewers tire of the coverage.

Perhaps it’s even more than just the divisive athletes who have ruined the games. The genuine level of competition has almost been destroyed by the US Olympic Committee who is more concerned about diversity and giving awards out to fewer white people as to promote fairness and equality.

Whatever happened to diversity being among people’s skill level and picking from that? It’s the entire purpose of the Olympics anyway which has now been made dull under this liberal agenda of fairness. It’s no longer enjoyable to watch when competitors are spewing hate anyway and the winners weren’t actually the best at their sport, just the right sexual orientation or race. It’s not even a competition at this point, it’s just a ribbon ceremony where everyone gets a participation prize and whiny athletes get all the attention for the wrong reasons.

BOMBSHELL REPORT: Look Who Approved Russian Operatives U.S. VISAS To ‘Interfere’ With Election!

The latest news in the Mueller FBI investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election has been released. Special counselor Robert Mueller has dropped close to twelve indictments on Russian operatives because he has evidence they interfered with the 2016 presidential election. However, there is no proof or allegation that the White House administration colluded with these Russians.

These Russian operatives who were allowed into the United States, their visas were approved by none other than former Secretary of State John Kerry.

The Gateway Pundit reported,

After sixteen months of investigations and over a year-and-a-half of the FBI and Obama administration spying on Donald Trump, his family, his business, his campaign, his transition team and his administration — Special Counsel Robert Mueller dropped an absolute nothing-burger today in announcing charges against Russian operatives who sullied the US election process.

The Mueller Special Counsel has yet to look at Saudi donations to Hillary Clinton or Clinton campaign collusion with Russia. The Mueller Special Counsel has yet to look at the “hacked” DNC servers or have not attempted to contact Julian Assange from Wikileaks. The indictment today contained the same Russian Facebook ads that were released in November 2017 by the House Intelligence Committee. Mueller and Democrats want you to believe these Russian Facebook ads flipped the election to Donald Trump.

But at least half of the ads are pro-Hillary. And Russia claims half of their paid ads ran after the election and 25% never ran at all. Facebook announced previously the Russian ads comprised .004% of their advertising during the election. Then there’s this. The Kerry State Department approved the visas for the Russian operatives to travel the US in 2014 through 2016 and attempt to interfere with the US election process.”

The Daily Beast reported,

“Multiple sources familiar with the Senate intelligence committee’s investigation tell The Daily Beast that Republican and Democratic staffers there have spoken with numerous people who worked in the State Department under then-Secretary of State John Kerry. Tom Malinowski, who was Kerry’s assistant secretary of state for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, told The Daily Beast that he spoke with Senate investigators. He said the meeting was informational and conversational, but didn’t elaborate.

Committee staff have also spoken with Jon Finer, Kerry’s chief of staff at State, according to a person familiar with that conversation. Both Democratic and Republican staff attended. Staffers spoke as well with Victoria Nuland, assistant secretary for European and Eurasian affairs, according to another source. Nuland is a favorite target of Russian state media, which leaked her phone calls in 2014. And Carter Page, the Trump campaign adviser-turned-FBI counterintelligence surveillance target, blamed her for “fomenting” efforts that ousted former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych. Yanukovych, incidentally, was one of Paul Manafort’s many controversial clients.

It isn’t surprising that Trump/Russia investigators would chat with former Foggy Bottom officials. The department’s diplomats have long tracked the Kremlin’s efforts to expand its regional hegemony—often using violent and illicit means. Malinowski, Nuland, and Finer all worked at high levels in the State Department while the Kremlin’s meddling efforts were underway.

Nunes, meanwhile, has promised to release information about the State Department’s potential role in the distribution of the Steele dossier. “We are in the middle of like whole phase two of our investigation, which involves other departments, specifically the State Department and some of the involvement that they had in this,” Nunes told Fox News in his first interview after the release of his controversial memo on surveillance of Page. “That investigation is ongoing and we continue to work towards finding answers and asking the right questions to try to get to the bottom of what exactly the State Department was up to in terms of this Russian investigation.””


This entire investigation has been based on the assumption that President Trump and his people colluded with the Russians in order to win the 2016 presidential election. However, out of all the charges and indictments, there has been no finding to that effect. Manafort and Papadopolous have been charged but they were bad actors all along. Even when they weren’t associated with the Trump administration.

As President Trump has noted, this is the biggest taxpayer scam there ever was. While the Russians have no doubt interfered they have been doing it to other countries too not just exclusively in the United States. Yet, Democrats have made it seem as though this is something that it is not.

Instead of wasting federal tax dollars on this investigation the money should be spent on veteran benefits, lowering prescription drug prices, federal employee salaries, pension benefits and more. The American people don’t deserve to have their hard earned money wasted on something like this.

Share if you agree the investigation is a waste of time, waste of space, and waste of money.

Share if you agree it is time to move on to other more important things.

Soros Calls on EU to Regulate Social Media to Fight Populism

Billionaire open-borders activist George Soros has demanded the European Union (EU) regulate social media because voters’ minds are being controlled and “manipulated”.

He claimed the size of social media firms made them a “public menace” and argued they had led people to vote against globalist causes, including electing President Donald J. Trump, in an article for The Guardian published Thursday.

The speculator, who runs one of the largest campaigning groups in the world and is noted for his interference in foreign politics and elections, said ultimately unregulated social media threatened democracy and the “integrity of elections”.

New media websites and populist groups have been prolific on social media, using the platforms to surpass mainstream media and promote causes Mr. Soros and his allies oppose.

Mr. Soros has a cosy relationship with the EU’s unelected leaders, meeting with them 11 times since the Brexit vote. Prime Minister Theresa May, in contrast, has had just three meetings in that period.

Just over a week ago, it was revealed Mr. Soros had quietly pumped half a million pounds into groups trying to block Brexit and overthrow the Tory government.

In the Guardian article, he wrote that social media can “influence how people think and behave without them even being aware of it” and “this interferes with the functioning of democracy and the integrity of elections”.


Due to social media use, he claimed people are losing “freedom of mind”, adding: “This danger does not loom only in the future; it played an important role in the 2016 US presidential election.”

“President Donald Trump would like to establish his own mafia-style state,” he said, claiming the President was part of the same problem as North Korean Dictator Kim Jong-un.

“In the US, regulators are not strong enough to stand up to the monopolies’ political influence. The EU is better positioned, because it doesn’t have any platform giants of its own,” he continued.

“The EU commissioner for competition Margrethe Vestager is the champion of the European approach,” he added, praising the bureaucrat who recently visited Communist Cuba without condemning human rights abuses in the nation.

Mr. Soros, who has been convicted of insider trading, is also suspected of attempting to interfere in U.S. elections, and his name came up around 60 times in emails released by WikiLeaks relating to the recent presidential race.